[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
    On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 15:36, Kenneth Johansson wrote:

    > > I must have missed that in the code. I can see you check __cli() status but
    > > I didn't see anywhere you check disable_irq(). Even if you did it doesnt
    > > help when I mask the irq on the chip rather than using disable_irq() calls.
    > >
    > > Alan
    > But you get interrupted by other interrups then so you have the same problem
    > reagardless of any preemtion patch you hopefully lose the cpu for a much
    > shorter time but still the same problem.

    Agreed. Further, you can't put _any_ upper bound on the number of
    interrupts that could occur, preempt or not. Sure, preempt can make it
    worse, but I don't see it. I have no bug reports to correlate.

    Robert Love

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.020 / U:5.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site