![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread
|
> So even the low priority process will have the same time as before to do > it's job, it will be delayed, but it will not be delayed forever, so I'm > failing to see how preempting Linux should deadlock. First task scheduled takes a resource that a second task needs. 150 other threads schedule via pre-emption, the one that it should share the resource with cannot run but the rest do. Repeat. It doesn't deadlock but it goes massively unfair - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||