Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:40:34 -0800 | From | Mike Kravetz <> | Subject | Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17 |
| |
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:25:43AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Mike Kravetz wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Chat - VolanoMark simulator. Result is a measure of throughput. > > Higher is better. > > very interesting numbers, nice work Mike! I'd suggest the following > additional test: please also run tests like VolanoMark with 'nice -n 19'. > The O(1) scheduler's task-penalty method works in our favor in this case, > since we know the test is CPU-bound we can move all processes to nice > level 19. > > Ingo
I'll do that in the next go around. Right now, I'm trying to get some TPC-H results.
-- Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |