![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 10:03:42AM +0100, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote: [snip] > Of course ordering rules must be obeyed, and side effects cannot be moved > across sequence points. Thus if the two volatile loads are in separate > instructions, as in: [snip] Sorry, if I'm rude, but is this discussion really going anywhere, and is it really necessary to have on lkml?! The signal/noise-ratio is low enough as it is. Instead of arguing about possible interpretations of the C-standard, why not do some real C-programming instead... Regards: David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||