lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromRusty Russell <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] minor sched-E1 tweaks and questions
DateThu, 10 Jan 2002 14:48:42 +1100
In message <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201091126520.2276-100000@localhost.localdomain> you 
write:
> > Q. How can this happen in expire_task():
> > 	if (p->array != rq->active) {
> > 		p->need_resched = 1;
> > 		return;
> > 	}
> if a task gets delayed by some really heavy IRQ load and the timer
> interrupt hits the task twice.

Hmm... still don't see it.  update_process_times() surely doesn't
re-enter?  And another CPU cannot load_balance() p (== current) away
from us.

Another question:

	if (likely(prev != next)) {
		rq->nr_switches++;
		rq->curr = next;
		next->cpu = prev->cpu;
		context_switch(prev, next);
		/*
		 * The runqueue pointer might be from another CPU
		 * if the new task was last running on a different
		 * CPU - thus re-load it.
		 */
		barrier();
		rq = this_rq();
	}
	spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
I do not understand this comment.  How can rq (ie. smp_processor_id())
change?  Nothing sleeps here, and if it DID change, the
spin_unlock_irq() would be wrong...

> i've taken your fixes, please double-check the next patch whether all of
> them are correctly applied.

Um, missed one:

 static struct runqueue {
-	int cpu;
 	spinlock_t lock;
-	unsigned long nr_running, nr_switches, last_rt_event;
+	unsigned long nr_running, nr_switches;
 	task_t *curr, *idle;
 	prio_array_t *active, *expired, arrays[2];
-	char __pad [SMP_CACHE_BYTES];
+	int prev_nr_running[NR_CPUS];
 } runqueues [NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned;
You want each entry in the array to be aligned, not the whole array!
You need to define the struct runqueue to be the cacheline aligned
(using ____cacheline_aligned since it's a type), THEN put the
__cacheline_aligned after the array declaration so it gets put in the
aligned section:
 struct runqueue {
 	spinlock_t lock;
	unsigned long nr_running, nr_switches;
 	task_t *curr, *idle;
 	prio_array_t *active, *expired, arrays[2];
	int prev_nr_running[NR_CPUS];
 } ____cacheline_aligned;
 static struct runqueue runqueues [NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned;

This is why my __per_cpu patch was invented 8)
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2008