![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 20020101 Richard Gooch wrote: > >Object-oriented programming is a good tool. One of many. But it >shouldn't be a religion, nor do you need to write in C++ to make use Use the right tool for the purpose. You bet for rewriting half the C++ runtime in C instead of not-using the bloated part of C++. Pretty. If you're going to program in a OO way, use an oo language. And I get tired of people saying C++ is bloat. My pupils at 5th course of Computer Science still think C++ is bloat. They have no idea on compilers. And they bless Ada. A 5th level virtual function still has only a one-level indirection overhead when called. Low level code is just as efficient as C. If a C++ program is bloated it is the programmers matter, not the language. >of it. A good example of object-oriented programming done in C is the >Xt toolkit. > kidding ???? Perhaps GTK+, but Xt... By -- J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... mailto:jamagallon@able.es Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 Linux werewolf 2.4.18-pre1-beo #3 SMP Thu Dec 27 10:15:27 CET 2001 i686 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:18 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||