[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue
    On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > On September 6, 2001 01:52 pm, Rik van Riel wrote:
    > > On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Jan Harkes wrote:
    > >
    > > > To get back on the thread I jumped into, I totally agree with Linus
    > > > that writeout should be as soon as possible.
    > >
    > > Nice way to destroy read performance.
    > Blindly delaying all the writes in the name of better read performance
    > isn't the right idea either. Perhaps we should have a good think
    > about some sensible mechanism for balancing reads against writes.

    Absolutely, delaying writes for too long is just as bad,
    we need something in-between.

    > > Lets face it, spinning the washing machine is expensive
    > > and running less than a full load makes things inefficient ;)
    > That makes a good sound bite but doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
    > It's not a washing machine ;-)

    Two words: "IO clustering".


    IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

    Send all your spam to (spam digging piggy)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.033 / U:1.580 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site