lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue


    --On Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:10 PM +0200 Stephan von Krawczynski
    <skraw@ithnet.com> wrote:

    > Obviously aging did not work at all,
    > there was not a single hit on these (CD image) pages during 24 hours,
    > compared to lots on the nfs-data.

    If there's no memory pressure, data stays in InactiveDirty, caches,
    etc., forever. What makes you think more memory would have helped
    the NFS performance? It's possible these all were served out of caches
    too.

    --
    Alex Bligh
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.024 / U:30.508 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site