[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue

    --On Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:10 PM +0200 Stephan von Krawczynski
    <> wrote:

    > Obviously aging did not work at all,
    > there was not a single hit on these (CD image) pages during 24 hours,
    > compared to lots on the nfs-data.

    If there's no memory pressure, data stays in InactiveDirty, caches,
    etc., forever. What makes you think more memory would have helped
    the NFS performance? It's possible these all were served out of caches

    Alex Bligh
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.063 / U:43.948 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site