![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
I have tried 2.4.9-xfs against 2.4.10-xfs with dbench. The machine has 384 MB ram. The throughput is roughly the same for both with dbench 2. dbench 32 runs fine on 2.4.9-xfs but does not finish on 2.4.10-xfs. dbench 24 will finish on 2.4.10 but it takes a very very long time. All dbench processes are stuck in D state after 10 seconds. I am not sure if it is the xfs part, the VM or both. Can you give the dbench 32 a try ? Regards Gerold On Thursday 27 September 2001 14:46, Robert Cohen wrote: > Given the recent flurry of changes in the Linux kernel VM subsystems I > decided to do a bit of benchmarking. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||