![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Pete Zaitcev writes: > By the way, why does everyone insist on using ide-tape? > It seems to be broken beyond any repair by injection of > lethal poison marked "OnStream Support" (not that it was brilliant > before, but that was the last nail in the coffin). Just use ide-scsi > and be done with it. I really do not enjoy reading ide-tape.c. I agree that ide-tape.c looks like a buggy piece of cr*p, but apart from that, what would I gain from using scsi tape on top of ide-scsi? Would it magically work on broken Colorados? /Mikael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||