lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Magic SysRq +# in 2.4.9-ac/2.4.10-pre12
    Hi!

    > > 2. I'd really prefer to see callers use
    > > register_sysrq_key() and unregister_sysrq_key() so that they
    > > can get/use return values, and not the lower-level functions
    > > "__sysrq*" functions that are EXPORTed in sysrq.c.
    > > I don't see a good reason to EXPORT all of these functions.
    >
    > So would I, however, the lower interface is there so that modules can
    > restructure the table in more complex ways, allowing for sub-menus.

    This is kernel, and sysrq was designed to be debug tool. It turned out
    to be more successfull than expected...

    Just keep in mind its a debug tool. If you need hierarchical submenus,
    then you are probably not using it as debug tool, right?
    Pavel
    --
    I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
    Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.037 / U:0.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site