lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Locking comment on shrink_caches()
    Date
    From
    >    Ahh, that's a cpu bug -- one my athlons don't suffer from.
    >
    > Your Athlons may handle exclusive cache line acquisition more
    > efficiently (due to memory subsystem performance) but it still
    > does cost something.

    On an exclusive line on Athlon a lock cycle is near enough free, its
    just an ordering constraint. Since the line is in E state no other bus
    master can hold a copy in cache so the atomicity is there. Ditto for newer
    Intel processors
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.023 / U:32.296 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site