[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Ext2-devel] [BUG?] ext3 0.9.10-2410 - root partition never marked dirty
    On Sep 24, 2001  14:15 -0700, Ryan Mack wrote:
    > It seems that the aforementioned changes in 2.4.10 has prevented the root
    > filesystem from having its superblock updated as dirty. It may be my
    > imagination, but since the root fs is already mounted ro when it's
    > remounted rw, the superblock isn't being updated with the needs_recovery
    > flag.

    OK, it's not exactly clear what you are referring to, but:
    1) On ext3 the superblock is NEVER marked dirty, because of the journal.
    As long as the journal is running normally, the filesystem will always
    be "clean".
    2) There should _not_ be a problem with the needs_recovery flag being set
    from within the kernel. HOWEVER, attempts to read it from user-space
    may fail because of a disconnect between the buffer cache and the page

    Now that these issues are in the open (and already being discussed) they
    will likely be fixed in a relatively short timeframe.

    Cheers, Andreas
    Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
    \ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?" -- Dogbert

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.060 / U:4.352 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site