Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 2 Sep 2001 10:11:21 -0300 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: Rik`s ac12-pmap2 vs ac12-vanilla perfcomp |
| |
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> No flames please - i know these were low VM loads, i did this just > to know how big is test rmaps maitenance overhead. It shows us that > even on low VM load there is a huge win in using rmap. And the win > increases with the VM load.
Interesting, I'm just at a proof-of-concept implementation right now, which is not yet stable or ready. ;)
I guess page replacement _is_ important...
cheers,
Rik -- IA64: a worthy successor to i860.
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |