lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.4.9-ac12 - problem mounting reiserfs (parse error?)

    Same here, cannot mount reiserfs partitions on boot.

    - Debian Sid
    - mount 2.11h
    - gcc-2.95.4 (20010902 Debian prerelease) and 3.0.2pre010908.

    But in my case I don't have "defaults" on fstab on my reiserfs partitions:

    /dev/hdc1 / ext2 defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1
    /dev/hdc5 /home reiserfs rw 0 2
    /dev/hdc6 /usr reiserfs rw 0 2
    /dev/hdc3 /var reiserfs rw 0 2


    On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Pavel Roskin wrote:

    > Hello!
    >
    > I've compiled 2.4.9-ac12 and it has problems mounting reiserfs partitions.
    >
    > This forks fine:
    >
    > mount /dev/hda6 /usr/local
    >
    > but "mount /dev/hda6" doesn't work if I have this in /etc/fstab:
    >
    > /dev/hda6 /usr/local reiserfs defaults 0 0
    >
    > It appears that "defaults" is confusing some code in the kernel. Here are
    > more results:
    >
    > # mount -t reiserfs -o defaults /dev/hda6 /usr/local
    > reiserfs kgetopt: there is not option
    > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda6,
    > or too many mounted file systems
    > # mount -t reiserfs -o rw /dev/hda6 /usr/local
    > reiserfs kgetopt: there is not option
    > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda6,
    > or too many mounted file systems
    > # mount -t reiserfs -o bogus /dev/hda6 /usr/local
    > reiserfs kgetopt: there is not option bogus
    > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda6,
    > or too many mounted file systems
    >
    > As you see, invalid options are distinguished ("there is not option
    > bogus", as opposed to "there is not option"), but all options are
    > considered invalid.
    >
    > "reiserfs kgetopt: there is not option" appears on the console and in the
    > dmesg output, it's not coming from mount.
    >
    > RedHat 7.1, i686, mount-2.11b-3 (from RedHat).
    >
    > No problems with 2.4.9-ac10. I haven't tried 2.4.9-ac12.
    >
    > I hope to send fix soon. Sorry, but I'm writing it in hurry to alert
    > others that 2.4.9-ac12 is not quite usable, at least with reiserfs.
    >
    > --
    > Regards,
    > Pavel Roskin
    >
    ---
    Fabian Arias Mun~oz | Debian GNU/Linux Sid
    a.k.a. dewback en | Kernel 2.4.9-ac10
    #linuxhelp IRC.CHILE | ReiserFS

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.029 / U:32.568 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site