lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [Q] Implementation of spin_lock on i386: why "rep;nop" ?
    Date
    From
    > The "rep;nop" line looks dubious, since the IA-32 programmer's manual from
    > Intel (year 2001) mentions that the behaviour of REP is undefined when it
    > is not used with string opcodes. BTW, according to the same manual, REP is
    > supposed to modify ecx, but it looks like is is not the case here... which
    > is fortunate, since ecx is never saved. :-)

    rep nop is a pentium IV operation. Its retroactively after testing defined
    to be portable and ok.

    Alan
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.022 / U:29.596 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site