lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subject[Q] Implementation of spin_lock on i386: why "rep;nop" ?
Hi all,

One of my coworkers directed my attention to the implementation of
spinlocks on IA-32. In spin_lock_string, we can read:

"cmpb $0,%0\n\t" \
"rep;nop\n\t" \
"jle 2b\n\t" \

The "rep;nop" line looks dubious, since the IA-32 programmer's manual from
Intel (year 2001) mentions that the behaviour of REP is undefined when it
is not used with string opcodes. BTW, according to the same manual, REP is
supposed to modify ecx, but it looks like is is not the case here... which
is fortunate, since ecx is never saved. :-)

What is the intent behind this "rep;nop" ? Does it really rely on an
undocumented behaviour ?


Regards,

--
Jean-Marc Saffroy - Research Engineer - Silicomp Research Institute
mailto:saffroy@ri.silicomp.fr

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site