lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe[2]: Shutting down NFS
Hello Jesse,

Wednesday, August 29, 2001, 3:58:07 PM, you wrote:
>> killall5 -15; sleep 5; killall5 -9; sleep 5
>> killall5 -15; sleep 5; killall5 -9; sleep 5
>> killall5 -15; sleep 5; killall5 -9 ?
>>
>> This looks ugly and total sleep time is 25 sec.
>> A better way is to make NFS daemons understand what user wants after
>> first call, not a third.

JP> This already looks like overkill :-) Only the first one should be
JP> needed. I can understand that NFSD could disable signal 15, but not
JP> how it can disable 9... The only way I know for that to happen is
JP> if the process is in an uninterruptable sleep for some reason (and
JP> that should only delay signal delivery, not eliminate it).

It looks like killall5 bug - "killall -9 nfsd" kills nfsd at once.
Do you know where killall5 source is? There's no killall5 in
util-linux...

Best regards,
VDA
--
mailto:VDA@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua
http://port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua/vda/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01    [W:0.024 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site