[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Updated Linux kernel preemption patches
Hello Robert Love,

> > It still borks, probably you are having other options in your kernel config
> > and sections you don't use may depend on dec_and_lock
> No, I have places in my kernel where atomic_dec_and_lock is used. In
> fact, one of the functions I was pasted where it broke was mmput() in
> kernel.S (i think from fork.c). I have that function, and it uses
> atomic_dec_and_lock...
> So the problem is most certainly something to do with your configuration
> not getting the dependency right to use atomic_dec_and_lock
> Out of curiosity, what CONFIG CPU are you defined to use?


> > First get it to work, and then spend time on keeping it current with alan's
> > and linus' tree.
> I am working, but it is not my code. I am merely trying to keep it in
> sync with the trees. I am trying to get it working for those who it
> does not compile for, but it works for me and others, so it is hard.

Andrey Nekrasov, SpyLOG.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:58    [W:0.069 / U:31.796 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site