Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:19:39 -0700 | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: Journal Filesystem Comparison on Netbench |
| |
Hans-
Have you consider using OSDL machines for your testing? It probably wouldn't replicate Andrew's systems exactly, but we do have [2,4,8]-way systems that could be made available for your use.
~Randy
Hans Reiser wrote: > > Please mount with -notails and repeat your results. ReiserFS can either save > you on disk space, or save you on performance, but not both at the same time. > That said, it does not surprise me that our locking is coarser than other > filesystems, and we will be fixing that in version 4. Unfortunately we don't > have the hardware to replicate your results. > > Hans > > Andrew Theurer wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I recently starting doing some fs performance comparisons with Netbench > > and the journal filesystems available in 2.4: Reiserfs, JFS, XFS, and > > Ext3. I thought some of you may be interested in the results. Below > > is the README from the http://lse.sourceforge.net. There is a kernprof > > for each test, and I am working on the lockmeter stuff right now. Let > > me > > know if you have any comments. > > > > Andrew Theurer > > IBM LTC - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |