[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [resent PATCH] Re: very slow parallel read performance
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 10:33:36PM +0100, Alan Cox <> wrote:
> > > exactly this is a point: my disk can do 5mb/s with almost random seeks,
> > > and linux indeed reads 5mb/s from it. but the userpsace process doing
> > > read() only ever sees 2mb/s because the kernel throes away all the nice
> > > pages.
> >
> > Which means the VM in the relevant kernel is probably crap or your working
> > set exceeds ram.
> The relevant kernel is linux (all 2.4 versions I tested), and no,
> working set exceeding ram should never result in such excessive
> thrashing. So yes, the VM in the kernel is crap (in this particular
> case, namely high-volume fileserving) ;)

This is because the readahead windows are too large so the
kernel ends up evicting data before its needed and has to
re-read the data.

Also see
in the Linux-MM wiki.

This problem should be relatively easy to fix for 2.4.


IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

Send all your spam to (spam digging piggy)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:58    [W:0.114 / U:1.188 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site