[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: kswap spinning

    On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

    > On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Mark Hemment wrote:
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > Jumping from 2.4.7 to 2.4.9 has shown up a problem with the VM balancing
    > > code.
    > > Under load, I've seen kswapd become a CPU hog (on a 5GB box). Now that
    > > I've got a theory, I cannot reproduce the problem for confirmation, but
    > > here is the theory anyway.
    > >
    > > The tests in free_shortage() and inactive_shortage() assume that the
    > > memory state for a zone can be improved by calling refill_inactive_scan(),
    > > page_launder(), the inode/dcache shrinking functions, and the general
    > > slab-cache reaping func. Usually, some combination of the reaping
    > > functions will improve a zone's state - but not always.
    > >
    > > The problem is the DMA zone. As it is (relatively) small on some archs
    > > (IA-32 for example), it is possible that almost all pages from this zone
    > > are being used by a sub-systems which simply won't give them up. Examples
    > > of use are; vmalloc()ed page for modules, pre-allocated socket buffs
    > > for NICs, task-structs/kernel-stack - you get the idea.
    > >
    > > In the case I believe I'm seeing, both free_shortage() and
    > > inactive_shortage() are returning a shortage for the DMA zone which
    > > triggers all the work in do_try_to_free_pages(). But as there aren't any
    > > DMA pages left in the page-cache, being used as anonymous pages, or being
    > > used in the other places the code looks, do_try_to_free_pages() returns
    > > non-zero to kswapd() and off we go again. This also causes callers of
    > > try_to_free_pages() (from __alloc_pages()) to suck CPU cycles as well.
    > >
    > > On HIGHMEM boxes, it is possible for the NORMAL zone to get into the
    > > same state (although v unlikely).
    > >
    > > I'd rather not get into having specialist code in mm/vmscan.c (or arch
    > > specific code) to handle a small DMA zone - so what are the other
    > > solutions? (Assuming the above theory holds true.)
    > >
    > > One possible solution is not to give DMA memory out, except for;
    > > o explicit DMA allocations
    > > o page-cache, anonymous page, allocations
    > > assuming explicit DMA allocations are low, we'll at least know the
    > > remaining DMA pages are somewhere we can get at them - would need to be
    > > trigger by an arch specific flag for those that don't have a "tiny" zone.
    > > However, I don't like this, feels like fixing the wrong problem. :(
    > The DMA zone problem _can_ happen, but it should also happen with 2.4.7 I
    > think. (I'm not completly sure, though. Maybe Linus changes to
    > try_to_free_pages() are the reason...)
    > Lets first find out the actual problem.
    > Could you please boot with profile=2 and use readprofile to find out where
    > kswapd is spending its time?

    Well, I've just noted Linus made kswapd loop as long as there is any kind
    (inactive or free) shortage.

    I guess that is the reason.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:57    [W:0.023 / U:175.464 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site