lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRE: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this)
    Date
    Chris,
    Which patch is the transaction packing patch? My build did have
    "knfsd-6.g" patch, which does the reiesrfs generation number stuff
    (attached).

    Erik

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Chris Mason [mailto:mason@suse.com]
    > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:25 AM
    > To: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1); 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'
    > Subject: re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results
    > sho w this)
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > On Monday, August 13, 2001 09:40:59 AM -0700 "HABBINGA,ERIK
    > (HP-Loveland,ex1)" <erik_habbinga@hp.com> wrote:
    >
    > > Here are some SPEC SFS NFS testing
    > (http://www.spec.org/osg/sfs97) results
    > > I've been doing over the past few weeks that shows NFS performance
    > > degrading since the 2.4.5pre1 kernel. I've kept the
    > hardware constant,
    > > only changing the kernel.
    >
    > Did the 2.4.5pre1 have the transaction tracking patch?
    >
    > -chris
    >

    [unhandled content-type:application/octet-stream]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:57    [W:0.036 / U:31.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site