Messages in this thread | | | From | "William Scott Lockwood III" <> | Subject | Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again) | Date | Wed, 4 Jul 2001 14:47:06 -0500 |
| |
Ditto. One with 320, one with 256 and one with 192. All dual booting Win98 or Win2k and Mandrake 8.0 with 2.4.3.
Scott
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: "Ronald Bultje" <rbultje@ronald.bitfreak.net> Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 2:29 PM Subject: Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again)
> > I'm kind of astounded now, WHY can't linux-2.4.x run on ANY machine in > > my house with more than 128 MB RAM?!? Can someone please point out to me > > Can I suggest you change your memory vendor and/or get an antistatic wrist > strap ? > > > that he's actually running kernel-2.4.x on a machine with more than 128 > > MB RAM and that he's NOT having severe stability problems? > > Multiple boxes, all solid with 256Mb > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |