lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: VM Report was:Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, John Stoffel wrote:

> >>>>> "Tobias" == Tobias Ringstrom <tori@unhappy.mine.nu> writes:
>
> Tobias> On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> >> I gave this a shot at my favorite vm beater test (make -j30 bzImage)
> >> while testing some other stuff today.
>
> Tobias> Could you please explain what is good about this test? I
> Tobias> understand that it will stress the VM, but will it do so in a
> Tobias> realistic and relevant way?
>
> I agree, this isn't really a good test case. I'd rather see what
> happens when you fire up a gimp session to edit an image which is
> *almost* the size of RAM, or even just 50% the size of ram. Then how
> does that affect your other processes that are running at the same
> time?

OK, riddle me this. If this test is a crummy test, just how is it
that I was able to warn Rik in advance that when 2.4.5 was released,
he should expect complaints? How did I _know_ that? The answer is
that I fiddle with Rik's code a lot, and I test with this test because
it tells me a lot. It may not tell you anything, but it does me.

-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans