[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Missing cache flush.
    > On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 07:01:28PM +0200, Jamie Lokier wrote:
    > Whether this works depends on the cache line replacement policy.
    > It will always work with LRU, for example, and probably
    > everything else that exists. But it is not guaranteed, is it?

    LFU, if used, wouldn't be flushed by this trick... Potentially, you could
    have a slice of kernel interrupt handler sitting in a cache line, having
    been accessed $BIG_NUMBER times... (Does anything actually use this
    approach, though???)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:0.036 / U:5.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site