lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: reschedule_idle changes in ac kernels
I ran the VolanoMark and TPC-H benchmarks on an 8 CPU system
to observe the differences when changing the value at which
preemptions are triggered. I used the 2.4.5 kernel as a basis
and only changed the 'max_prio = ' statement in reschedule_idle()
to change the preemption trigger threshold. In the 2.4.5 kernel
the value of max_prio is set to 1.

The results:

In VolanoMark, changing the preemption trigger from 1 to 0
resulted in a 4% drop in throughput.

In TPC-H there was virtually no difference when going from
1 to 0. If anything, the results were slightly better with
0 as a threshold value as opposed to 1.

My guess is that the threshold value was changed from 0 to
1 in the 2.4 kernel for better performance with some workload.
Anyone remember what that workload was/is?

--
Mike Kravetz mkravetz@sequent.com
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans