lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    Marc Lehmann wrote:


    > Aren't PCI delayed transaction supposed to be handled by the pci master
    > (e.g. my northbridge), not by the (software) driver for my pdc(?) I would
    > also be surprised if my pdc actually used that feature, not to speak of
    > the fact that the promise + harddisk worked fine in another computer (the
    > data corruption was easily detectable, one couldn't even write 500megs
    > without altered bytes).


    Wrong way round. You're right that the pci master is supposed to handle
    delayed transactions, but during data transfer the pdc is the pci master
    and the northbridge is the PCI target.

    --
    Adrian Cox http://www.humboldt.co.uk/

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:4.108 / U:0.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site