[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Marc Lehmann wrote:

    > Aren't PCI delayed transaction supposed to be handled by the pci master
    > (e.g. my northbridge), not by the (software) driver for my pdc(?) I would
    > also be surprised if my pdc actually used that feature, not to speak of
    > the fact that the promise + harddisk worked fine in another computer (the
    > data corruption was easily detectable, one couldn't even write 500megs
    > without altered bytes).

    Wrong way round. You're right that the pci master is supposed to handle
    delayed transactions, but during data transfer the pdc is the pci master
    and the northbridge is the PCI target.

    Adrian Cox

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:0.024 / U:6.168 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site