[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFC: Changes for PCI

"David S. Miller" wrote:

> Looks, ppc64 is really still experimental right?

Heck no.

> Which means it is
> 2.5.x material, and 2.5.x has been quoted as being a week or two away.

I sure hope that ppc64 is NOT considered 2.5.x material.

> So we can solve this problem for real, with system bus domains, and
> get ppc64 working all within the framework of 2.5.x which is just
> around the corner.

A real solution would be nice. And if the real solution can ONLY be in 2.5, then
is it such a bad idea moving the bus number type to unsigned int for 2.4.x?

> For now, I am rather sure your systems for testing have < 256 physical
> PCI busses and you can for 2.4.x use the remapping scheme sparc64 uses.

Wellll, remember that post about more than 256 PCI buses? I meant it.


Tom Gall - PPC64 Maintainer "Where's the ka-boom? There was
Linux Technology Center supposed to be an earth
(w) shattering ka-boom!"
(w) 507-253-4558 -- Marvin Martian

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.106 / U:2.676 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site