Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 25 Jun 2001 01:08:01 +0200 (CEST) | From | Sasi Peter <> | Subject | Re: [OT] gcc 2.95.2 vs. 3.0 (fwd) |
| |
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> Sure it is opendivx ? I think you are just using gcc compiled code for > the 'interface' and 'glue' to windows divx decoders (/usr/lib/win32/*.dll) > that do the real hard work.
Have a look at mplayer.sourceforge.net. MPlayer besides DLL loading also features native Opendivx en/decoding, and native MPEG1/2 decoding. Actually the tests were performed by the leader of the development of mplayer, and he did compile the whole opendivx encore/decore code used in this player, taken from the original sources.
> Redo the tests with am MPEG2 movie.
Actually since the original posting, on the mplayer-devel list the maintainer of mpeg2play (the portable parts of mplayer as a separate player, w/o the dll stuff) also tested how well MPEG1/2 decoding works if compiled w/ gcc 2.95.2 vs 3.0, and he was disappointed too, because there was a slight decrease in the performanceof the generated code...
If you want proof of these, grab the C sources from the mentioned sourceforge project site, and repeat the test yourself.
-- SaPE - Peter, Sasi - mailto:sape@sch.hu - http://sape.iq.rulez.org/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |