[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: is complete
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 08:45:17AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> >> It allows a general interface to the kernel that does not require new
> >> syscalls/ioctls and can be accessed from user space without specifically
> >> compiled programs. You can use shell scripts, java, command line etc.
> >
> >Yes, and it's also totally non standardised.
> It clearly fills a need, though, and has the distinct side benefit of
> cutting down on the proliferation of ioctls. Sure, it's non-standard
> and a mess. But it's semi-documented, easy to use, and v. general.
> What's the preferred alternative, to state the first question another
> way? For any single small project/driver, creating a new fs simply
> isn't going to happen.
> --
> /Jonathan Lundell.

If I understand Al Viro correctly we'll get per driver filesystems
in 2.5 (based on ramfs) which you can union-mount on /proc
(possibly using autofs) to get the current /proc tree.

Happy Hacking.

Linux 2.4.5-ac6 #1 Fri Jun 1 17:12:42 CEST 2001
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:0.140 / U:5.108 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site