[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: is complete
    On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 08:45:17AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
    > >> It allows a general interface to the kernel that does not require new
    > >> syscalls/ioctls and can be accessed from user space without specifically
    > >> compiled programs. You can use shell scripts, java, command line etc.
    > >
    > >Yes, and it's also totally non standardised.
    > It clearly fills a need, though, and has the distinct side benefit of
    > cutting down on the proliferation of ioctls. Sure, it's non-standard
    > and a mess. But it's semi-documented, easy to use, and v. general.
    > What's the preferred alternative, to state the first question another
    > way? For any single small project/driver, creating a new fs simply
    > isn't going to happen.
    > --
    > /Jonathan Lundell.

    If I understand Al Viro correctly we'll get per driver filesystems
    in 2.5 (based on ramfs) which you can union-mount on /proc
    (possibly using autofs) to get the current /proc tree.

    Happy Hacking.

    Linux 2.4.5-ac6 #1 Fri Jun 1 17:12:42 CEST 2001
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:0.021 / U:18.680 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site