Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 May 2001 12:36:18 +0200 (CEST) | From | BERECZ Szabolcs <> | Subject | Re: page_launder() bug |
| |
On Mon, 7 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> My patch is crap and can cause corruptions, there is not argument > about it now :-) is it the only bug in the swap handling? or why is this bug triggered so heavily if the swap is on a filesystem? I had oopses when I used a swapfile on a partition, but that was really rare. I even don't think it's becouse page_launder(). so what's so different if the swap sits on a filesystem?
Bye, Szabi
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |