Messages in this thread |  | | | From | "David S. Miller" <> | | Date | Mon, 7 May 2001 01:54:29 -0700 (PDT) | | Subject | Re: page_launder() bug |
| |
Tobias Ringstrom writes: > But is it really specified in the C "standards" to be exctly zero or one, > and not zero and non-zero?
I'm pretty sure it does.
> IMHO, the ?: construct is way more readable and reliable.
Well identical code has been there for several months just a few lines away.
I've seen this idiom used in many places (even the GCC sources :-), so I'm rather surprised people are seeing it for the first time.
Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |