[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] arp_filter patch for 2.4.4 kernel.
    > > also -- isn't it kind of wrong for arp to respond with addresses from
    > > other interfaces?
    > Usually it makes sense, because it increases your chances of successfull
    > communication. IP addresses are owned by the complete host on Linux, not by
    > different interfaces.

    this is one of those things that is still hurting Linux's credibility in the
    read world. people see this kind of obviously broken behavior, and install
    *BSD or Solaris instead.

    isn't this clearly a case of the kernel being too smart: making it impossible
    for a clueful admin to do what he needs? multi-nic machines are now quite
    common, but this "feature" makes them far less useful, since the stack is
    violating the admin's intention.

    > For some weirder setups (most of them just caused by incorrect routing
    > tables, but also a few legimitate ones; including incoming load balancing
    > via multipath routes) it causes problems, so arpfilter was invented to
    > sync ARP replies with the routing tables as needed.

    there's NOTHING weird about a machine having two nics and two IPs,
    wanting to behave like two hosts.

    is there any positive/beneficial reason for the current behavior?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.023 / U:34.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site