Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] net #6 | Date | Thu, 31 May 2001 22:35:38 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> > They are done this way to get good non SMP performance. Your changes would > > ruin that. > > Maybe macro "spin_lock_irqsave_on_smp()" would be good idea? These > ifdefs look ugly. Maybe local to driver, maybe even global.
I had that argument with Linus about globally and ended up with ifdefs. I agree about locally - feel free
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |