lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: NEWBEE "reverse ioctl" or someting like
    Date
    On Thursday 03 May 2001 14:29, sébastien person wrote:
    > hi,
    >
    > I've made a network driver wich is attached to the serial port.
    > The network hardware is able to return information to the pc. theses
    > informations are belong to the configuration of the hardware. I
    yes yes all your base are belong to us :)
    > succeed on receive information in the driver but I've no idea to alert
    > higher process (like configuration app ...) that I've received something
    > (wich is not network data like TCP or ARP etc ...).
    >
    > I think that use of pipe isn't preconised because I must fork process
    > to use pipe, I search something like ioctl but in the other way :
    >
    > kernel process ---> user process
    >
    > Is somebody know the best and easy way ??
    copy_to_user ?
    >
    > thank (I hope this is the right place to ask)
    >
    > sebastien person
    > -
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    Bye
    Bye
    Niko

    --
    Nikolas Zimmermann
    wildfox@kde.org
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:4.523 / U:0.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site