[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: unsigned long ioremap()?
"David S. Miller" wrote:
> There is a school of thought which believes that:
> struct xdev_regs {
> u32 reg1;
> u32 reg2;
> };
> val = readl(&regs->reg2);
> is cleaner than:
> #define REG1 0x00
> #define REG2 0x04
> val = readl(regs + REG2);
> I'm personally ambivalent and believe that both cases should be allowed.

Agreed... Tangent a bit, I wanted to plug using macros which IMHO make
code even more readable:

val = RTL_R32(REG2);
RTL_W32(REG2, val);

Since these are driver-private, if you are only dealing with one chip
you could even shorten things to "R32" and "W32", if that doesn't offend
any sensibilities :)

Jeff Garzik | Game called on account of naked chick
Building 1024 |
MandrakeSoft |
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.138 / U:1.672 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site