lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information to SCSI layer
    At 9:32 AM +0200 2001-05-03, Kai Henningsen wrote:
    >jlundell@pobox.com (Jonathan Lundell) wrote on 26.04.01 in
    ><p05100303b70eadd613b0@[207.213.214.37]>:
    >
    >> At 10:31 PM -0600 2001-04-26, Richard Gooch wrote:
    >> >BTW: please fix your mailer to do linewrap at 72 characters. Your
    >> >lines are hundreds of characters long, and that's hard to read.
    >>
    >> Sorry for the inconvenience. There are a lot of reasons why I believe
    >> it's properly a display function to wrap long lines, and that an MUA
    >> has no business altering outgoing messages (one on-topic reason being
    >> that patches get screwed up by inserted newlines), but I grant that
    >> there are broken clients out there that can't or won't or don't wrap
    >> at display time.
    >
    >What's a lot more important is that the mail standards say that this stuff
    >should not be interpreted by the receivers as needing wrapping, so
    >irregardless of good or bad design it's just plain illegal.
    >
    >If you want to support wrapping with plain text, investigate
    >format=flowed.

    Yes, I did that.

    I'm curious, though: I haven't found the mail standards that forbid
    receivers to wrap long lines. Certainly many mail clients do it.
    What's the relevant RFC?

    >MfG Kai


    --
    /Jonathan Lundell.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.043 / U:30.852 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site