Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 May 2001 20:19:39 -0300 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock removal, balancing & cleanup |
| |
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> But Linus is right I think - VM changes often prove > 'interesting'. Test it in -ac , gets some figures for real world > use then plan further
Oh well. As long as he takes the patch to page_alloc.c, otherwise everybody _will_ have to "experiment" with the -ac kernels just to have a system with highmem which doesn't deadlock ;)
cheers,
Rik -- Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |