[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up
    On 21 May 2001 02:11:39 -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
    > On 20 May 2001, Robert M. Love wrote:
    >>(on another note, about the coexist issue: am i going to have a python
    >>and python2 binary? so now the config tool will find which to use, ala
    >>the kgcc mess? great)
    > For the record, the kgcc "mess" you speak of was used by
    > Conectiva, and I believe also by debian before adoption in Red
    > Hat Linux. It was about as good a solution as one could get for
    > the problem that it solved - the kernel being broken and unable
    > to build with our gcc-2.96. Just to head anyone off at the
    > pass... the kernel is fixed and now builds properly with
    > gcc-2.96.

    my view of the mess wasn't the fact RedHat used kgcc. i think that was a
    good move.

    i mean how in 2.2 the Makefile must search out for gcc, kgcc, gcc-2.95,
    gcc-2.91 etc. what is the cml2 parser going to do? search for my python2
    binary because my python1 binary is my "standard" python?

    Robert M. Love

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.021 / U:38.484 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site