![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > but ;-) > > Looking at the locking and trying to think SMP (grunt) though, I > don't like the thought of taking two locks for each page until > 100%. The data in that block is toast anyway. A big hairy SMP > box has to feel reclaim_page(). (they probably feel the zone lock > too.. probably would like to allocate blocks) Indeed, but this is a separate problem. Doing per-CPU private (small, 8-32 page?) free lists is probably a good idea, but I don't really think it's related to kreclaimd ;) regards, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||