![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Matthew Wilcox writes: > On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 12:51:23PM -0600, Richard Gooch wrote: > > Al, if you really want to kill ioctl(2), then perhaps you should > > implement a transaction(2) syscall. Something like: > > int transaction (int fd, void *rbuf, size_t rlen, > > void *wbuf, size_t wlen); > > > > Of course, there wouldn't be any practical gain, since we already have > > ioctl(2). Any gain would be aesthetic. > > I can tell you haven't had to write any 32-bit ioctl emulation code for > a 64-bit kernel recently. The transaction(2) syscall can be just as easily abused as ioctl(2) in this respect. People can pass pointers to ill-designed structures very easily. The main advantage of transaction(2) is that hopefully, people will not be so bone-headed as to forget to pass sizeof *structptr as the size field. So perhaps some error trapping is possible. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||