[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up
    Alan Cox <>:
    > > I think you're confusing a couple of different issues here, Alan. Even
    > > supposing CML2 could parse CML1 rulesets, the design question about how
    > > configuration *should* work (that is, what kind of user experience we
    > > want to create and who we optimize ruleset design for) wouldn't go away.
    > It would. Because people who like the old config would continue to use the
    > old tools

    Excuse me?

    Alan, it sounds very much like you just said something stupid. This
    seems sufficiently unlikely that I am shaking my head in disbelief and
    fingernailing wax out of both ears (and if you think doing both those
    things at once is easy try it sometime :-)).

    Do you really believe that anyone is going to maintain the CML1 tools
    for as long as a nanosecond after they get dropped out of the kernel tree?

    Even supposing somebody were loony enough to do that, how would preserving
    an old interface in amber do anything to explore new UI possibilities?

    Perhaps I'm just unusually dense this morning.
    <a href="">Eric S. Raymond</a>

    Alcohol still kills more people every year than all `illegal' drugs put
    together, and Prohibition only made it worse. Oppose the War On Some Drugs!
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.022 / U:2.464 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site