[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: CML2 design philosophy heads-up
    On Fri, 18 May 2001, Jes Sorensen wrote:

    > Oh I don't, on the other hand I see you consistently ignoring the
    > needs and requirements of the users. So far I haven't heard a single
    > developer say something positive about CML2, the most positive I have
    > heard so far has been "whatever", "it's his choice", "I don't care",
    > "I want to hack". The majority are of the "NO!" and "you got to be
    > kiddin'".

    Perhaps your hearing has gone more than a bit selective. Please, allow
    me to be the first to get through:

    I think CML2 looks very interesting, and while it's not quite primetime yet,
    it's definitely a movement in the right direction. I'd even go sofar as to
    say I think CML2 is a GOOD THING.

    Or perhaps you have a more selective definition of developer?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.025 / U:1.540 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site