Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up | Date | Fri, 18 May 2001 18:33:15 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> Do you really believe that anyone is going to maintain the CML1 tools > for as long as a nanosecond after they get dropped out of the kernel tree?
Do you really believe anyone would be dumb enough to delete them out of spite or to further your political machinations if they could both handle the same configuration language.
CML1 has had no official maintainer for about 4 years. People contribute bits and it works. So as it stands there would be no reason to remove it.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |