[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

    On Tue, 15 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
    > >
    > > Nobody really uses it because it would require you to add a line or two to
    > > your init scripts to pick up the major number from /proc/devices, and
    > > that's obviously too hard. Much better to just hardcode randome numbers,
    > > right?
    > modprobe ?

    I was being ironic.

    Yes, it's used. Not very widely at all, and historically what has actually
    happened is that people have used the dynamic numbers for a while, but in
    order to become "real members of society" they've applied for a real
    static major number even if the dynamic one worked fine.

    Silly, yes.

    Note that my whole argument is that we do NOT need more of the static
    numbers, and we should NOT expand the major number space
    unnecessarily. We _can_ make do with devfs (trivially - no need to do
    anything at all, as devfs already handles the case of dynamic major
    numbers quite well).

    But the fact remains that some users want to (a) avoid devfs and (b) have
    static maintenance. And I'm ok with that too, but only if the static major
    number is in the form of a _generic_ number that has absolutely nothing to
    do with any specific drivers (which is why I'd be perfecly ok with still
    adding a "disk" major number, but which is why I do NOT want to have Peter
    give out "the random number of today" to various stupid device drivers).

    So we seem to be in violent agreement here.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.022 / U:139.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site