[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectTCP capture effect (was Re: Linux TCP impotency)

    Alan Cox wrote:

    > > causes the earlier started one to survive and the later to
    > > starve. Running bcp instead of the second (which uses UDP) at
    > > 11000 bytes per second caused the utilization in both directions
    > > to go up nearly to 100%.
    > >
    > > Is this a normal TCP stack behaviour?
    > Yes. TCP is not fair. Look up 'capture effect' if you want to know more.

    I'm seeing a similar effect myself. When I use all my available sdsl
    bandwidth (say doing a bulk data transfer), DNS lookups will often
    time out. This is with the default buffer settings/2.4.4.
    I'm curious about this effect so I've been trying to find information
    on this and while I can find lots of information on the Ethernet
    capture effect there doesn't seem to be anything on the TCP capture
    effect. Could someone point me at an explanation of this effect?


    /Sam Meder

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.019 / U:57.488 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site