Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 12 May 2001 11:56:20 -0300 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd CPU cycles |
| |
On Tue, 8 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> So instead, you could test for the condition that prevents any > possible forward progress, no?
if (!order || free_shortage() > 0) goto try_again;
(which was the experimental patch I discussed with Marcelo)
regards,
Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |