Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 May 2001 09:21:10 -0500 | From | Shawn <> | Subject | Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3 |
| |
On 05/10, Matthias Andree rearranged the electrons to read: > On Wed, 09 May 2001, Mart?n Marqu?s wrote: > > > There has also been lots of talks about reiserfs being the cause of > > some data lose and performance lose (not sure about this last one). > > I never experienced ReiserFS data loss, but I did experience read > performance loss over ext2fs and switched that file system back to ext2. > The ReiserFS people could not reproduce the problem, so I'm not sure > what was the actual cause. > > ext3fs has never given me any problems, but I did not have it in > production use where I discovered major ReiserFS <-> kNFSd > incompatibilities. ext3 has a 0.0.x version number which suggests it's > not meant for production use. > > XFS is claimed to work with NFS, but not currently availabe for Linux > 2.4.4.
$ uname -r 2.4.4-ac5.xfs $ uptime 9:20am up 1 day, 18:28, 4 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
-- Hob Goblin z3rk@ahkbarr.dynip.com
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither. - Thomas Jefferson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |