Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 1 May 2001 11:37:58 +0200 | From | Ingo Oeser <> | Subject | Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? |
| |
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 07:11:35PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > pjalbrecht@home.com said: > > Where can I find an analysis of the relative strengths and weaknesses > > of KDB and KGDB for kernel debug? Has the linux community come to any > > consensus regarding the utility one or the other? > > You ought to add UML to the list, since it is useful for > debugging any part of the kernel that's not arch code or a > hardware device driver (except that there's now USB support for > UML).
Basically you could add support for ALL generic subsystems, that support dummy hardware, like SCSI and ISDN for example.
Is that planned or do I suggest sth. stupid here? ;-)
Regards
Ingo Oeser -- 10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag> <<<<<<<<<<<< been there and had much fun >>>>>>>>>>>> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |